- The jail terms, of between four and four-and-a-half years in prison, were issued to Kamal Hinduja, Prakash Hinduja and their son Ajay and his wife Namrata
- In an earlier statement, the spokesperson also said that the family members have been acquitted of all charges
NE NEWS SERVICE
NEW DELHI, JUNE 24
Days after a Swiss court gave out jail terms to Britain’s wealthiest family, the Hindujas, their spokesperson said that neither of the members has been put in jail.
They said that they were “appalled” by the court’s and have filed an appeal in a higher court challenging the verdict. The Swiss court had found them guilty of exploiting vulnerable domestic workers from India employed at their villa in Geneva.
The jail terms, of between four and four-and-a-half years in prison, were issued to Kamal Hinduja, Prakash Hinduja and their son Ajay and his wife Namrata. They are all Swiss nationals.
The statement, issued on Saturday, said that none of them have been subjected to any “imprisonment, conviction, sentence or detention.”
“Per Swiss law procedures, the lower court’s judgement is rendered ineffective and inoperative as the presumption of innocence is paramount until and unless a final judgment by the highest adjudicating authority is enforced,” the family’s spokesperson said.
“It may be noted that the case has no complainants left anymore and they had declared in the court that they were led into signing statements that they didn’t even understand. They had neither intended to nor initiated such proceedings. All of them further testified that the four Hinduja Family Members treated them with ‘respect, dignity and like family’,” they added.
In an earlier statement, the spokesperson also said that the family members have been acquitted of all charges. They also dismissed reports saying that some members of the family faced detention.
“Our clients have been acquitted of all human trafficking charges. We are appalled and disappointed by the rest of the decision made in this court of first instance, and we have, of course, filed an appeal to the higher court, thereby making this part of the judgement not effective,” the statement signed by lawyers Yael Hayat and Robert Assael and Roman Jordan said.
“Under Swiss law, the presumption of innocence is paramount till a final judgement by the highest adjudicating authority is enforced. Contrary to some media reports, there is no effective detention for any members of the family,” they said.
The lawyers also pointed out that “it should also be recalled that the plaintiffs in this case had withdrawn their respective complaints after declaring to the court that they had never intended to be involved in such proceedings.”
