RAJAN VERMA
Recently, under the AtmaNirbhar Bharat (Self-reliant India) scheme, the Centre has announced that to improve autonomy, accountability, and efficiency in ordnance supplies, it would undertake corporatisation of the Ordnance Factory Board (OFB). The employees have expressed discontentment against the move and have given the notice to go on indefinite strike from October 12, 2020. The area of their major apprehension and fear is that the decision of corporatisation will impact their service conditions.
I am a retired officer of the Central Labour Services having devoted my entire career to ensure harmonious industrial relations by taking care of the well-being of workers, which enabled in upkeeping in the morale and motivation of the employees. I have also played a key role in various mediation and conciliation processes that resulted in amicable settlements. In fact, when corporatisation of Ordnance Factory Board (OFB) was mooted in August 2019, I facilitated bilateral discussions between the office- bearers of the employee federations of Ordnance Factories and senior officials of the Ministry of Defence. We ushered in a mechanism in the Ministry of Defence wherein the senior officials have engaged in continuous dialogue or discussions with the employees’ unions to address the concerns raised by them.
Safeguarding the employees’ interests and precedents
Having 200-year-old history, Ordnance Factories have travelled a long way from being under the Indian Army initially to the Department of Defence Production with a Board structure. They are a subordinate office under the Department with personnel who are the Government of India employees. They form the largest and oldest departmentally-run industrial organisation in India. Ordnance Factories Board is headquartered at Kolkata and comprises 41 factories spread over 10 states.
Also read: http://navjeevanexpress.com/why-corporatisation-of-ordnance-factory-board-will-not-go-the-bsnl-way/
The total number of employees on the rolls of the organisation is 78,433, including Group A, Group B and Group C categories. They all are employees of the Government of India and the conditions of their services are governed by the Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965, or CCS (CCA) Rules. Since the ordnance factories are also ‘industry’ and covered under the Industrial Disputes Act 1947, provisions of other labour legislations are also applicable to them.
There have been many instances of how the government has safeguarded employees’ interests in the process of corporatisation. The experiences gained while converting government departments as corporations, viz. BSNL formed out of the Department of Telecommunication (DoT) in October 2000 and the Security Printing and Minting Corporation of India Limited (SPMCIL) formed by the Department of Economic Affairs January 2006, will surely be useful in the case of OFB too.
In both cases, regular employees were given the option to get absorbed in the company. However, in case a few employees intended to continue in a Government job, they were to be deployed in some other department or government organisation based on their qualifications, experience, and availability of vacancies. If redeployment was not possible, then such employees were retained in the surplus pool of government.
Advantages galore
In the case of BSNL, all the employees have been absorbed to the newly formed PSU along with their posts on existing terms and conditions on as is where is the basis, on deemed deputation, without deputation allowance as per the agreement with the Group C & D employees. The settlement ensured job security in the manner by which the Administrative Ministry retained the power of reviewing the decision of removal/dismissal of any employee of the PSU. The employees were changed over to industrial Dearness Allowance (IDA) pay scales which were substantially higher than the Government Pay Scale pattern and were also given personal upgradation in the next higher pay scale which was hugely beneficial to the employees.
CCS pension an icing on the cake
The promotions were made time-bound at all levels for the employees being absorbed in the PSU in case of Group C & D employees. The government guaranteed the payment of pension to the employees under the provisions of the Rule 37-A of CCS (Pension) Rules. These packages benefitted the employees to the extent that all employees in the level of Group C&D have opted for absorption in the PSU.
In SPMCIL, the matter of terms and conditions of permanent absorption of employees, a Memorandum of Settlement was created during the course of conciliation proceedings under Section 12 (3) of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 before the Chief Labour Commissioner. The employees were given the option to migrate to the wage pattern of PSUs [under Industrial Dearness Allowance (IDA) pattern] along with special allowances which were substantially higher than the government pay scales. The settlement guaranteed job security to all the employees post corporatisation i.e. under no circumstances, any of the employees would be kept on retrenched even after absorption.
Till the absorption process is completed, all employees would be kept on deemed deputation which means the government employees are allowed to work in the PSU by retaining their lien in the government jobs. The service conditions of all the employees on deemed deputation were to be fully protected and there shall be no changes in the same which will be less favourable to such employees even after absorption. The pension matter was also amicably settled. Thus SPMCIL corporatisation was successfully completed wherein about 16,500 employees exercised their option to get absorbed.
It is learnt that there is a proposal to set up an Empowered Group of Ministers (EGoM), inter alia, to facilitate decision on the protection of employees’ interests which shall provide the best platform to facilitate continuous dialogue process between the Government machinery and the employees’ federations and unions to redress issues of mutual concerns.
I am confident that the service conditions of existing employees will be protected suitably as has been done in the above cases and it will result in these employees reaping the fruits of corporatisation.
The author is a Former Chief Labour Commissioner. He can be reached at rajanvermaluck@gmail.com
